You dont get it: Its not about ads, its about behavioural targeting and tracking.
We are disappointed that violating our privacy and compromising our security are the ways you have chosen to monetise your service. We hope you will stop blocking valuable tools like Better that protect people from trackers, ad-delivered trojans, and other web malware.
While we hope you will reconsider your malicious stance against human rights, we are not willing to sit idly by and let you compromise our privacy and security in the meanwhile. So, in addition to blocking the roughly 50 third-party trackers that your site exposes us to, we are also blocking your blocker blocker with the following rule:
- trigger: - url-filter: wired.com/assets/load - load-type: first-party - action: - type: block
We can play this game of cat and mouse all day long. Or, you can ask yourselves whether this is really the game you want to play. How will you explain your escalating disdain for the rights of your readers to your employees; most of whom, were sure, are decent folks who just want to do the right thing?
If you want to make money while respecting our rights, you have ways of doing so that dont track us or compromise our privacy and security.
You can, for example, use non-behavioural ads that dont track people (like The Deck does).
Or, you can switch completely to a subscription model and abandon behavioural advertising altogether.
Or, you can engage with a service like Flattr, or join with other publishers to create your own.
Its not our job to come up with ethical alternatives to your current business model. However, if we can come up with three viable ones off the cuff, Im sure you can do even better if you decide to dedicate yourselves to it.
What we will not tolerate is this attempt to keep your core business based on behavioural advertising and tracking while attempting to extort funds from your readers who are simply trying to protect their privacy and security on the web.
We urge you to reconsider the ethics of your business model.
You have alternatives. We hope you will choose one that respects the rights and safety of your readers.