The last time Hackerfall tried to access this page, it returned a not found error. A cached version of the page is below, or click here to continue anyway

Rabid Brains - The Ember runloop

The Ember runloop

A deep dive into the motivations and benefits of the Ember runloop


This blog post is a snapsnot of the Ember Run-loop Handbook on Github. Ember is an evolving framework so the occasional care and feeding required to keep this document current will happen there.


You can get started with Ember application development without understanding the runloop. However at some point you will want to dig in and understand it properly so you can use it skillfully. It is my sincere hope that this handbook can be your guide.

We are about to take a deep dive into the Ember.js runloop. Together we will answer these questions:

  1. Why does Ember have this runloop thing?
  2. What is the runloop?
  3. How can we use it skillfully?

This is not reference documentation - the Ember API docs have that nicely covered. This isnt even the Im an experienced dev, just give me the concepts in a succinct way documentation - the Official Ember Run-loop guide has that covered. This is a longer, more detailed look at the runloop.

Naming is hard

As you learn more about the Ember runloop you will come to understand that, well, it just isnt very loopish. The name is a bit unfortunate as it implies that there is a single instance of the runloop sitting somewhere in memory looping endlessly running things. As we will see soon this is not true.

In alternate universes the runloop might have been named:

OK some of those names are really terrible (except Runelope of course, that one is pure gold and should be immediately pushed to Ember master). Naming is a hard problem and hindsight is 20/20. The runloop is what we have so that is what we will call it but try not to infer too much about its action from its name.

Why do we have a runloop?

On our journey to understand the runloop we must first understand the environment it lives in and the problems it is trying to solve. Lets set the scene by refreshing a few fundementals about how Javascript runs. (If you are an experienced Javascript developer you may want to just skip this part)

Our story begins with when the browser sends a request to the server and the server sends HTML back as a response.

The browser then parses this HTML response. Every time it finds a script it executes it immediately(*) Lets call this the setup phase. This setup phase happens well before the user sees any content or gets a chance to interact with the DOM. Once a script is finished executing the browser never runs it again.

(*) Things like defer tweak this somewhat but this is a useful simplification.

The browser does most of its communication with Javascript by sending events. Usually these are created in response to some action from one of:

  1. The user e.g. moves their mouse (mousemove)
  2. The network e.g. an asset have been loaded on the page (load)
  3. Internal timers e.g. a particular timer has completed

However there are a few events that the browser generates itself to tell Javascript about some important event in the lifecycle of the page. The most widely used of these is DOMContentLoaded which tells Javascript that the HTML has been fully parsed and the DOM (the memory structure the browser builds by parsing the HTML) is complete. This is significant for Javascript because it does most of its setup work in response to this event.

Javascript is lazy but well prepared! During the setup phase, Javascript prepared its work space (or mise en place if you prefer) - it created the objects it would now need to respond to orders (events) from the browser and also told the browser in detail what events it cares about e.g.

Hey browser, wake me up and run this function Im giving you whenever the user clicks on an element with an id attribute of do-stuff.

The description above makes it look like the browser the one giving all the orders but the browser is a team player and has a few things it can do to help Javascript get the job done:

  1. Timers. Javascript can use the browser like an alarm clock:

    Javascript: Hey browser, wake me up and run this function Im giving you in 5 seconds please.

  2. Talking to other systems. If Javascript needs to send or receive data to other computers it asks the browser to do it:

    Javascript: Hey browser, I want to get whatever data is at please.

    Browser: Sure thing but it might take a while. What do you want me to do when it comes back?

    Javascript: I have two functions ready to go (one for a successful data fetch and one for a failure) so just wake me up and run the appropriate one when you finish.

    Browser: cool.

We usually refer to this talking to other systems stuff as Web APIs e.g.

Javascript can use these services of the browser both during the setup phase and afterwards. For example part of the Javascript response to a click event on a certain element might be to retrieve some data from the network and also schedule a timer to do some future work.

We now know enough to see the pattern of how javascript and the browser interact and to understand the two phases:

  1. In the short setup phase the browser runs each script it finds on the page from start to finish. Javascript uses this as time to do some preparation for next phase.
  2. Javascript spends most of of its life responding to events. Many events come from the user but Javascript can also schedule events for itself by using the many services (web APIs) that the browser provides.

A solid understanding of this stuff is required to understand the runloop so if you are unclear about any of this and want to dig a little deeper I recommend a wonderful video by Philip Roberts at Scotland JS that goes into the Javascript event loop in more detail. It is a short watch and includes a few aha!-inducing diagrams.

Enter the Ember!

Things we already know

Since Ember is Javascript we already know quite a bit about how Ember works:

Where does the framework end and my app begin

How does your Ember application relate to the Ember framework? The machinery for responding to events is part of Ember framework itself but it does not have a meaningful response without your application code.

For example if the user is on /#/blog/posts and clicks a link to go to /#/authors/shelly the Ember framework will recieve the click event but it wont be able to do anything meaningful with it without

  1. A Router map to tell it how to understand the URL
  2. The Route objects themselves e.g. BlogRoute, PostsRoute, AuthorsRoute
  3. The models, controllers, views that all play a part in putting new data on the screen

What events does Ember listen to?

The Ember docs have a list of events Ember listens for by default which I have repeated here:

  1. touchStart
  2. touchMove
  3. touchEnd
  4. touchCancel
  5. keyDown
  6. keyUp
  7. keyPress
  8. mouseDown
  9. mouseUp
  10. contextMenu
  11. click
  12. doubleClick
  13. mouseMove
  14. mouseEnter
  15. mouseLeave
  16. submit
  17. change
  18. focusIn
  19. focusOut
  20. input
  21. dragStart
  22. drag
  23. dragEnter
  24. dragLeave
  25. dragOver
  26. dragEnd
  27. drop

These are the entry points into our code. Whenever Ember code runs after the setup phase, it is in response to an event from this list.

How ember listens for events

This is a good resource for refreshing your understanding of how DOM events work. To get the most of the following discussion you should be familiar with how the browser propagates events and what the phrases capturing phase and bubbling phase mean.

Ember registers listeners for these events similarly to how we might do it ourselves with jQuery i.e.

Example: A simplistic approach

The pattern of how Javascript (Ember) works is periods of intense activity in response to some event followed by idleness until the next event happens. Lets dig a little deeper into these periods of intense activity.

We already know that the first code to get run in reponse to an event is the listener function that Ember registered with the browser. What happens after that?

Lets consider some code from an imaginary simple Javascript app:,js,console,output

This code manages the Mark all completed button in the UI.

Click the button a few times and notice the console output. Notice that there are some patterns to the tasks performed:

  1. Updating the model
  2. Updating the DOM (rendering)

and that the do work as you find it approach that this app takes causes these different types of work to be interleaved.

The code in this app is obviously very incomplete and Im sure you can see many ways it could be improved. However there are some problems that might not be obvious at first, problems that you will only start to notice when the app grows in complexity. To understand these lets look at what it is not doing:

  1. It is not coordinating its access of the DOM. Every time the app updates the DOM the browser does a layout and paint. These are very expensive operations especially on mobile devices.
  2. It has no way of telling us when DOM updating is finished. We can certainly hook into the click handler for the Mark all completed button but what if had started some asynchronous work like updating the server? If this app was more realistic it would be very difficult to know where we should add code that would be run when all DOM updates had finished.
  3. It is not controlling when objects get deleted. Currently our app is so trivial that this is not a problem but imagine if we had hundreds of todo items and complex processing of each one i.e. processing each todo item created a lot of temporary objects in memory. After a while the browser will decide that enough is enough and that it needs to clean up these objects and make their memory available again i.e. it will run garbage collection. Since our app cannot run while GC is happening the user may notice a pause.

Together these problems mean our simplistic Todo app will have serious scaling problems.

Enter the runloop

We have identified some problems caused by an uncoordinated approach to doing work. How does Ember solve them?

Instead of doing work as it finds it, Ember schedules the work on an internal set of queues. By default Ember has six queues:

// ["sync", "actions", "routerTransitions", "render", "afterRender", "destroy"]

Each queue corresponds to a phase of work identified by the Ember core team. This set of queues and the code that manages them is the Ember runloop.

You can see a summary of the purpose of each queue in the runloop Guide but here we are going to focus on the queues themselves.

How it works

First lets get some terminology sorted:

How Ember handles events:

  1. A browser event happens and Embers registered listener for that event is triggered.
  2. Early on in its response to the event, Ember opens a set of queues and starts accepting jobs.
  3. As Ember works its way through your application code, it continues to schedule jobs on the queues.
  4. Near the end of its response to the event Ember closes the queue-set and starts running jobs on the queues. Scheduled jobs can themselves still add jobs to the queues even though we have closed them to other code.
  5. The runloop Guide has an excellent visualisation of how jobs are run but in brief:
    1. Scan the queues array, starting at the first until you find a job. Finish if all queues are empty.
    2. Run the job (aka execute the callback function)
    3. Go to step 1

Lets consider some subtle consequences of this simple algorithm:

Something that is not obvious from that description is that there is no singleton runloop. This is confusing because documentation (including this guide) uses the phrase the runloop to refer to the whole system but it is important to note that there is not a single instance of the runloop in memory (unlike the Ember container which is a singleton). There is no the runloop, instead there can be multiple instances of a runloop. It is true that Ember will usually only create one runloop per DOM event but this is not always the case. For example:

Another consequence of the runloop not being a singleton it that it does not function as a global gateway to DOM access for the Ember app. It is not correct to say that the runloop is the gatekeeper to all DOM access in Ember, rather that coordinated DOM access is a pleasant (and deliberate!) side-effect of organising all the work done in response to an event.. As mentioned above, multiple runloops can exist simultaneously so there is no guarantee that all DOM access will happen at one time.

How often do runloops happen?

From what I have observed, Ember typically runs one runloop in response to each DOM event that it handles.

Visualising the runloop for yourself

This repo also contains the noisy runloop kit which is trivial demo app and a copy of Ember that I have patched to be very noisy about what its runloop does. You can add features to the demo app and see how the actions the runloop takes in response in the console. You can also use the included version of Ember in your own project to visualise what is happening there. Obviously you should only include this in development because it will slow the runloop down a lot.

Enough with the mousemove already!

When you start getting the runloop to log its work you will quickly get overwhelmed by its running in response to mouse events that happen very frequently on desktop browsers e.g. mousemove. Below is an initializer for Ember that will stop it listening to certain events. You probably want to add this to whatever Ember app you are trying to visualise the runloop for unless you are actually using mousemove, mouseenter, mouseleave in your app.

 * Tell Ember to stop listening for certain events. These events are very
 * frequent so they make it harder to visualise what the runloop is doing. Feel
 * free to adjust this list by adding/removing events. The full list of events
 * that Ember listens for by default is at

  name: 'Stop listening for overly noisy mouse events',

  initialize: function(container, application) {
    var events = container.lookup('event_dispatcher:main').events;
    delete events.mousemove;
    delete events.mouseenter;
    delete events.mouseleave;

What are autoruns?

Calls to any of

have the property that they will approximate a runloop for you if one does not already exist. These automatically (implicitly) created runloops are called autoruns.

Lets consider an example of a click handler:

  console.log('Doing things...');'actions', this, function() {
    // Do more things
  });'afterRender', this, function() {
    // Yet more things

When you call schedule Ember notices that there is not a currently open runloop so it opens one and schedules it to close on the next turn of the JS event loop.

Here is some pseudocode to describe what happens:

  // 1. autoruns do not change the execution of arbitrary code in a callback.
  //    This code is still run when this callback is executed and will not be
  //    scheduled on an autorun.
  console.log('Doing things...');'actions', this, function() {
    // 2. schedule notices that there is no currently available runloop so it
    //    creates one. It schedules it to close and flush queues on the next
    //    turn of the JS event loop.
    if (! {;
      nextTick(function() {

      }, 0);

    // 3. There is now a runloop available so schedule adds its item to the
    //    given queue'actions', this, function() {
      // Do more things


  // 4. scheduleOnce sees the autorun created by schedule above as an available
  //    runloop and adds its item to the given queue.'afterRender', this, function() {
    // Yet more things


Although autoruns are convenient you should not rely on them because:

  1. The current JS frame is allowed to end before the run loop is flushed, which sometimes means the browser will take the opportunity to do other things, like garbage collection.
  2. Only calls to run.schedule, run.scheduleOnce and run.once are wrapped in autoruns. All other code in your callback will happen outside Ember. This can lead to unexpected and confusing behavior.

How is runloop behaviour different when testing?

We know that

create a new runloop if one does not exist and that these automatically (implicitly) created runloops are called autoruns.

If Ember.testing is set then this automatic runloop approximation creation behaviour is disabled. In fact when Ember.testing is set these three functions will throw an error if you run them at a time when there is not an existing runloop available.

The reasons for this are:

  1. Autoruns are Embers way of not punishing you in production if you forget to open a runloop before you schedule callbacks on it. While this is useful in production, these are still issues you should fix and are revealed as such in testing mode to help you find and fix them.
  2. Some of Embers test helpers are promises that wait for the run loop to empty before resolving. If your application has code that runs outside a runloop, these will resolve too early and gives erroneous test failures which can be very difficult to find. Disabling autoruns help you identify these scenarios and helps both your testing and your application!

How do I use the runloop?

The Ember runloop API docs are the canonical resource on what each function does. This section will provide a high-level overview of how the API works to make it easier to categorise it in your head and put it to use.

In the API we have:

Function Which runloop? Which queue? Creates new runloop? Notices Ember.testing? Runs callback in current JS event loop turn? always-new actions Always No Yes always-new actions Always No No always-new actions Always No No current actions If required No Yes current actions If required No No current chosen by param If required Yes Yes current chosen by param If required Yes Yes current actions If required Yes No future actions If required Yes No future actions If required Yes No NA NA Never No NA NA NA Never No NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


A note about future work

There are two functions in the runloop API that let us schedule future work:


Each of these API functions is a way of expressing when you would like work (a callback function) to happen. The guarantee provided by the runloop is that it will also manage the other work that results from running that function. It does not guarantee anything else!

The key points:


A note about rate control

Ember provides two flavors of rate control.

These functions are useful becuase they allow us to control when the given callback is not run. When it is actually run, these functions use so these functions can be thought of as with some extra controls about when the function should be run


It can take a while to get our heads around the subtleties of the runloop. In exchange we get the performance and scaling benefits that the runloop provides. I hope that you now feel more equipped to use the runloop skillfully.

Happy hacking.



The primary documentation for the Ember runloop is Official Ember Run-loop guide and the Ember API docs

These are other sources I studied in compiling this guide:

Continue reading on